News — PERK

3 Urgent Actions Needed: Stop FDA Approval of Pfizer Shots for Kids 6 Months to 4 Years

FDA
Call to Action 1

The Decision Makers

Stop FDA Approval of Pfizer Shots for Kids 6 Months to 4 Years. We have 5 days to stop the FDA.  When you click submit, it will automatically send to all the decision-makers’ direct emails.

Take action and use this LINK

FDA
Call to Action 2

Submit Formal Comments to the FDA TODAY. Stop FDA Approval of Pfizer Shots for Kids 6 Months to 4 Years.

We have 5 days to stop the FDA. Comments received on or before February 10, 2022, will be provided to the committee. The FDA has now opened up formal comment for the Feb. 15 VRBPAC meeting. Please submit formal comments to the FDA.

Take action and submit comment here.

Sample Letters to FDA.

“Alert FDA, Stop, Do NOT Approve Pfizer Shots for Kids 6 Months to 4 Years

Previously, coronavirus trials failed in animals. When animal trials were skipped in 1960, infants post vaccination, got sicker when exposed to wild virus, including 80% of the vaccinated infants requiring hospitalization.

The clinical trial recently failed in this age group.”

Excellent Template Letter by Dr. Stephanie Sur. Use Sample Template Here. Here are 12 additional Sample Letters to FDA. Most of you will probably want to submit electronically here:

https://www.regulations.gov/search?filter=fda-2022-n-0082

Submit electronically here.

FDA has established a docket for public comment on this meeting. The docket number is FDA-2022-N-0082.  The docket will close on 11:59pm Eastern time on February 14, 2022. 

Select Category: Individual Consumer or Health Professional. Submit comments by February 14, 2022. Late, untimely filed comments will not be considered. 

State a few sentences or use templates here. Explain why the FDA must vote NO. 

  • There is no emergency in this age group that would justify this use.

  • The clinical trial of the Pfizer vaccine failed in this age group. 

  • You must vote NO because this proposed use violates the prohibitions against illegal medical experiments as outlined in the Nuremberg Code.

Read more details here if needed. Sample Letters to FDA

Take Action Here

Governor Newsom Call to Action 3

End The Mask Mandate On Children

The PERK Team has confirmed through direct sources that this Call to Action is legitimate. Newsom's office is gathering data right now about potentially ending the child mask mandate. Help the children in California!

Take Action

Call (916) 445-2841 to share your thoughts. (You can leave a recorded message if you'd like).

Press 1 for English. Press 6 Leave a message.

If You Missed It.
Here is Call to Action 4

Call senate rules committee

Thank You for Answering the Call and Taking Action Today!

Share

Stop FDA Approval of Pfizer Shots for Kids 6 Months to 4 Years on February 15

Stop FDA Approval of Pfizer Shots for Kids 6 Months to 4 Years on February 15

by Toby Rogers,PhD

UPDATE: The clinical trial failed in this age group. We have 5 days to stop the U.S. Food and Drug Administration from committing a crime against humanity. Comments received on or before February 10, 2022, will be provided to the committee.

Please submit formal comments to the FDA.
Sample Letters to FDA.

The FDA has now opened up formal comment in connection with the Feb. 15 VRBPAC meeting:

FDA has established a docket for public comment on this meeting. The docket number is FDA-2022-N-0082.  The docket will close on February 14, 2022. Submit either electronic or written comments on this public meeting by February 14, 2022. Please note that late, untimely filed comments will not be considered. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of February 14, 2022. Comments received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be considered timely if they are received on or before that date.

Most of you will probably want to submit electronically here:

https://www.regulations.gov/search?filter=fda-2022-n-0082

Select Category: Individual Consumer or Health Professional

A few sentences is fine. Simply explain why the FDA must vote NO. I like:

1. There is no emergency in this age group that would justify this use;
2. The clinical trial of the Pfizer vaccine failed in this age group; and
3. You must vote NO because this proposed use violates the prohibitions against illegal medical experiments as outlined in the Nuremberg Code.

Pfizer announcement wants their disastrous mRNA shot added to the official schedule for children so that they can have liability protection forever.

The Pfizer mRNA shot in children 2- to 4-years old failed in the clinical trial.

Acting FDA Commissioner, Janet Woodcock, following orders from the Biden administration said, (I’m paraphrasing here) ‘don’t worry about the fact that the shot does not work, we’ve got a drug to sell, submit an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application anyway.’

So Tuesday (Feb. 1) Pfizer submitted an EUA application for children six-months to four-years old.

Pfizer and the FDA are proposing to start with two shots in this age group even though that approach has already failed and then they will add a third dose later in the spring if data comes in that supports that use. The plan is literally — shoot up kids first, get the data later. This approach is completely unprecedented in the history of the FDA and it must be stopped.

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee will meet in two weeks — on February 15 — to evaluate this EUA application for a product that failed the clinical trial.

Your Action is Needed!

So warriors, you know what to do. I need you to get on the phone, get your fax machines humming, and start sending out emails like the future of this country depends on it — because it does. Physical paper letters sent in the next couple days via the U.S. Postal Service will probably get there in time too.

In October we generated tens of thousands of calls, emails, and faxes. Our goal in the next two weeks must be to generate hundreds of thousands of calls, emails, faxes, and letters.

The message we need to send to these bureaucrats is — ABSOLUTELY NOT! Every single person who plays a role in this decision needs to get the message that:

1. We are watching;
2. The clinical trial of the Pfizer vaccine failed in this age group; and
3. You must vote NO because this proposed use violates the prohibitions against illegal medical experiments as outlined in the Nuremberg Code.

Anyone who goes along with Janet Woodcock’s bullying on behalf of the cartel will be prosecuted for crimes against humanity.

It’s hard to know exactly who will be at the VRBPAC meeting because the FDA uses Temporary Voting Members and the VRBPAC has not met since we exposed them as frauds back in October (when they rubber stamped Pfizer’s EUA application for kids 5 to 11 in spite of no data showing clinical effectiveness). But the best guess is that the voting members will be roughly the same as the last meeting so that is who we are reaching out to now.

Here are the 23 people we need to reach before Tuesday, February 15:

Janet Woodcock
Acting FDA Commissioner
FDA, mail stop: HFD-001
10903 New Hampshire Ave., WO51-6133
Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
phone: (301) 796-5400
fax: (301) 847-8752
Janet.Woodcock@fda.hhs.gov
https://twitter.com/DrWoodcockFDA

Rochelle Walensky
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Roybal Building 21, Rm 12000
1600 Clifton Rd
Atlanta, GA 30333
phone: (404) 639-7000
Aux7@cdc.gov
https://twitter.com/CDCDirector

Xavier Becerra
Secretary, Health & Human Services
200 Independence Avenue S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201
c/o Sean McCluskie
sean.mccluskie@hhs.gov
https://twitter.com/XavierBecerra

Peter Marks
Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
FDA, Mail stop: HFM-2
10903 New Hampshire Ave., WO71-7232
Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
phone: (240) 402-8116
fax: (301) 595-1310
Peter.Marks@fda.hhs.gov

Acting Chair, VRBPAC
Arnold Monto, M.D.
Professor of Public Health & Epidemiology
Department of Epidemiology
University of Michigan School of Public Health
Ann Arbor, MI 48109 
phone: (734) 764-5453
fax: (734) 764-3192
asmonto@umich.edu

Paula Annunziato, M.D.
Vice President and Therapeutic Area Head
Vaccines Clinical Research
Merck
North Wales, PA 19454
paula.annunziato@merck.com

Captain Amanda Cohn
Chief Medical Officer
National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Rd
Atlanta, GA 30333 MS C-09
phone: (404) 639-6039
fax: (404) 315-4679
acohn@cdc.gov
anc0@cdc.gov

Hayley Gans, M.D.
Professor of Pediatrics
Department of Pediatrics
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, CA 94305
phone: (650) 723-5682
fax: (650) 725-8040
hgans@stanford.edu

Michael Kurilla, M.D., Ph.D.
Director, Division of Clinical Innovation
National Center for Advancing Translation Sciences
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD 20852
phone: (301) 435-0178
Michael.kurilla@nih.gov

H. Cody Meissner, M.D.
Professor of Pediatrics
Tufts University School of Medicine
Director, Pediatric Infectious Disease
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, MA 02111
phone: (617) 636-5227
fax: (617) 636-4300
cmeissner@tuftsmedicalcenter.org

Paul Offit, M.D.
Professor of Pediatrics
Division of Infectious Diseases
Abramson Research Building
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, PA 19104
phone: (215) 590-2020
offit@chop.edu
https://twitter.com/DrPaulOffit

Steven Pergam, M.D.
Medical Director
Infection Prevention
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, WA 98109
phone: (206) 667-7126
spergam@fredhutch.org
https://twitter.com/PergamIC

Temporary Voting Members (but their votes count all the same)

A. Oveta Fuller, Ph.D. 
Associate Professor of Microbiology and Immunology,
University of Michigan Medical School
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
phone: (734) 647-3830
fullerao@umich.edu

James Hildreth, Sr., Ph.D., M.D. 
Professor
Department of Internal Medicine
School of Medicine
President and Chief Executive Officer
Meharry Medical College
Nashville, TN 37205 
officeofthepresident@mmc.edu
https://twitter.com/JamesEKHildreth

Jeannette Lee, Ph.D. 
Professor Department of Biostatistics
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, AR 72701
phone: (501) 526-6712
JYLee@uams.edu 

Ofer Levy, M.D., Ph.D.
Staff Physician & Principal Investigator
Director, Precision Vaccines Program
Division of Infectious Diseases
Boston Children’s Hospital
Harvard Medical School Associate Member
phone: (617) 919-2900
fax: (617) 730-0254
ofer.levy@childrens.harvard.edu
https://twitter.com/levy_o

Patrick Moore, M.D., M.P.H. 
Distinguished and American Cancer Society Professor
Pittsburgh Foundation Chair in Innovative Cancer Research
University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
Pittsburgh, PA 15213 
phone: (412) 623-7721
psm9@pitt.edu

Michael Nelson, M.D., Ph.D. 
Professor of Medicine 
Asthma, Allergy and Immunology Division 
UVA Division of Asthma, Allergy & Immunology
PO Box 801355
Charlottesville, VA 22908
phone: (434) 297-8399
fax: (434) 924-5779
mrn8d@virginia.edu

Stanley Perlman, M.D., Ph.D.
Professor of Pediatrics
University of Iowa
3-712 Bowen Science Building (BSB)
51 Newton Rd
Iowa City, IA 52242
phone: (319) 335-8549
stanley-perlman@uiowa.edu

Jay Portnoy, M.D.
Director,
Division of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
Children’s Mercy Hospitals & Clinics
2401 Gillham Road Kansas City, MO 64108
phone: (816) 960-8885
fax: (816) 960-8888
Jportnoy@cmh.edu

Eric Rubin, M.D., Ph.D. 
Editor-in-Chief
New England Journal of Medicine
Adjunct Professor
Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health
665 Huntington Ave
Building 1, Room 811
Boston, MA  02115
phone: (617) 432-3335
erubin@hsph.harvard.edu
erubin@nejm.org

Mark Sawyer, M.D.
Professor of Clinical Pediatrics 
8110 Birmingham Way
Bldg. 28, 1st Floor
San Diego, CA 92123
phone: (858) 966-7785
fax: (858) 966-8658
mhsawyer@health.ucsd.edu

Melinda Wharton, M.D., MPH
Associate Director for Vaccine Policy
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
1600 Clifton Road, Mailstop E05,
Atlanta, GA 30333
phone: (404) 639.8755
fax: (404) 639.8626
mew2@cdc.gov

Please be respectful and courteous. Let’s do this! 🙌

Share

SB 866 and SB 871 upates and Call To Action

The Senate Rules Committee met Feb. 9th at 1:30pm and no bills were referred to any committees.

Senator Tony Atkins, Rules Committee Chair, started the meeting by addressing the public's concerns that these bills were being fast-tracked (Watch here: https://youtu.be/yf80qqXos3U) . She clarified that the Senate had voted (31 - 6) to dispense with Article IV, Section 8(a) of the CA Constitution and to suspend Joint Rules 55, thereby waiving the 30 day in print rule, for ALL bills introduced in the Senate (not just the two vaccine related bills). She further explained that for COVID planning, this made it easier to coordinate sending as possible to a committee so as to reduce the number of hearing dates needed. She ended with saying that even with the 30 day in print rule being waived, there will be no committee hearings until March.

PERK also submitted a letter request to the Senate Rules Committee for SB 871 to be referred to the Health, Education, and Judiciary committees and for SB 866 to be referred to the Health and Judiciary committees. While we oppose these bills, having them referred to multiple committees slows down the process and gives us multiple opportunities to kill the bill.

CALL TO ACTION

Contact the Senate Rules Committee:
(916) 651-4120

Calling is best, but if you are not able to call, then please email:
Chinook.Shin@sen.ca.gov

Here is the Rules committee contact info:

And make the following two requests:

“Hi. My name is ***** and I live in *****. I am calling to ask that …

  1. SB 871 be referred to the following three committees: Health, Education, and Judiciary

  2. SB 866 be referred to the following two committees: Health and Judiciary

Thank you so much.”

If you want to provide more information, feel free to add …

  • SB 871 should be referred to the Education Committee because 27% of teens (870,000 kids) and 65% of 5-11 year olds (2.3 million kids) are not currently vaccinated for COVID-19. This could lead to independent study options being overwhelmed. Also, if a large number of students leave the public school system, this will have a fiscal effect on schools.

  • SB 871 should also be referred to the Judiciary Committee as it is removing completely the Personal Beliefs Exemption. This removes the legislative process for adding future vaccine requirements for school attendance.

  • SB 866 should be referred to the Judiciary Committee because it removes the ability of parents to be involved in the medical treatment of their minor children.

You can also make an appointment TODAY to meet with your CA State Senator today to discuss SB 871 and SB 866.
Find your rep here: https://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/ (Note: No need to contact your Assembly Member yet)

--------------------------------------------------------

Background Information: This CTA is urgent due to the Senate voting yesterday to waive the 30 day waiting period for taking action on bills that are introduced in regards to SB 871 and SB 866. This means the timeline is moved up for when these bills can be heard and voted on in committee and on the floor. SB 866 (Wiener. Minors: vaccine consent) allows minors 12 years and older to consent to vaccines including the COVID-19 vaccine and SB 871 (Pan. Public health: immunizations) adds COVID-19 to the list of diseases children must be immunized against in order to attend school without the option of a personal beliefs exemption. 

SB 871 Public health: immunizations (Pan): Would require the COVID-19 vaccine to attend in-person daycare and K-12 public or private school, starting January 1 2023. It would also remove the personal belief exemption from future CDPH added vaccines and removes the 7th grade exemption for Hepatitis B. (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB871)

SB 866 Minors: vaccine consent (Weiner): Would remove parental consent and “authorize a minor 12 years of age or older to consent to vaccines that meet specified federal agency criteria. The bill would authorize a vaccine provider, as defined, to administer a vaccine pursuant to the bill, but would not authorize the vaccine provider to provide any service that is otherwise outside the vaccine provider’s scope of practice.” (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB866)

Share

SENATE BILL 866 - VIOLATION OF PARENTAL CONSENT

Bill Summary and Call To Action

California Senate Bill 866

VIOLATION OF PARENTAL CONSENT

  •  Bill Would Allow Minors to be Vaccinated Without Parental Consent.

  •  Undermines Parents’ Decision-Making For Their Own Children.

  •  Sets Up Our Children For Injury and Possibly Death From Covid Vaccines. 

Senate Bill 866 was introduced by Senators Wiener and Pan on Jan. 20, 2022 before the CA Legislature, which would allow minors –aged 12 years and up– to take a vaccine without the consent of their parents. This means that a 12 year old could walk into a clinic, get a Covid-19 “vaccination,” without parental consent or even knowledge.

S.B. 866 would allow authorities such as medical practitioners and school personnel, to be able to entice, pressure or coerce our children to take the shot, without regard to parental concerns, family medical history, and other medical contraindications, including prior reactions to vaccines, that could cause injury and even death.

S.B. 866 would undermine parental consent once again, under existing law allowing minors to override parental consent for the diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmissible diseases, expanding it under Section 6931 of the Family Code, to include vaccines, specifically the Covid-19 vaccine, and possibly more in the future, including boosters and new vaccines.

It is also modeled on the San Francisco order allowing minors aged 12 yrs and up to get a COVID-19 vaccine if a parent is not reachable.

The only stipulation is that vaccines must be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and be advised by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

S.B. 866 would authorize a “vaccine provider,” such as a clinic or licensed health facility to administer a vaccine to a 12 year old child, and up, without parental knowledge or consent. And there is zero liability for the vaccine provider —leaving parents completely responsible for treatment of any injuries from adverse effects.

  • A 12 year old child is not equipped to comprehend or assess the risks and benefits of a vaccine.

  • A 12 year old child might not be aware of disease, family history or even their own adverse effects from previous vaccines, and be unable to properly convey pertinent health details to the healthcare personnel administering the vaccine regarding contraindications and precautions -which could prove extremely dangerous.

  • A 12 year old child is not equipped to deal with the potential adverse effects of such a vaccine– conditions such as Pericarditis, Myocarditis, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, Anaphylaxis, and more -including death- that are known reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines.

  • A 12 year old child is easily influenced by peer pressure and by persons in authority over them, such as teachers and school personnel, who are unequipped to make such a medical decision that disregards their own specific medical condition and personal situation, and who might not have their best interests at heart.

  •  A 12 year old child cannot differentiate between coercion and informed consent.

  •  A 12 year old child is still under the care and protection of their parent, and deserve the protection their parent provides against societal/governmental/medical/and pharmaceutical overreach.

 S.B. 866 is a violation of moral law, circumventing the fundamental rights of parents to care for their own children, which are God-given rights and responsibilities.

 S.B. 866 is a violation of informed consent laws which prohibit medical procedures to be performed without full information regarding the risks and benefits, and without coercion or pressure of any kind, including incentives, as per the U.S. Constitution and international law.

 S.B. 866 is a violation of science. Vaccines have failed, are unnecessary, and risky.

  • Current Covid-19 vaccines are ineffective, as they have failed to protect people from getting infected and/or from transmitting the virus to others.

  • The Covid-19 vaccines are riddled with adverse effects. There are hundreds of thousands of vaccine injuries, and over 20,000 deaths reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). In particular, the coronavirus vaccines are known to cause Myocarditis, among other serious conditions, among young people, especially young men.

Long-term effects are completely unknown and it’s safety unproven.

www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/
www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php

Vaccines are recognized to be “unavoidably unsafe” by the US Federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which has awarded over $4.4 billion to vaccine victims. www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/index.html www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php

 

Children are at extremely low risk for hospitalization or death from the coronavirus. Data shows that the only deaths to children from C-19 are those who had serious comorbidities.

Children are virtually at no risk from the virus,
but significant risk from the Covid-19 vaccine.

This proposed bill deserves adamant opposition to prevent it from becoming law! Keep minor children under the care and responsibility of their parents. Prevent children from making decisions that they are not yet cognitively able to make. Prevent this over-reaching bill from potentially harming our children from vaccine injury and to prevent the overthrow of the most basic of all rights -the responsibility for the protection of the health and safety of their children! 

URGENT CALL TO ACTION- Oppose S.B. 866

Help Protect Our Children and Fundamental Parental Rights

Register your opposition to this legislation.

Contact:

Offices are open Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM.

State your name, address, and that you oppose bill numbers SB866 & SB871 (Info below) You will need to provide your address to verify you are a constituent.

If you don’t feel comfortable speaking, you may register your opposition on their website.

If you write in a 2nd language, they will translate and register your statement.

5 Additional reasons you can state to oppose SB866:

  1. SB866 undermines empowerment of women. Presumes women as mothers cannot be informed, educated, or make decisions for their children.

  2. Also undermines ESL and non-English speaking parent communities. It's already difficult for them to know what's going on with their child at school with limited translations. This will widen that gap.

  3. Last year, legislators thought that children couldn’t make safe decisions about vaping. If that’s true, they wouldn’t be mature enough to make serious medical decisions about receiving medical interventions like vaccines.

  4. Vaccines are liability free, if anything bad were to happen to a child for receiving a vaccine without parent knowledge or consent, the state would not be liable.

  5. Because there are possible risks and long term studies are still being conducted, parents must be aware and give consent.

Share

Get Involved

Subscribe to our newsletter.