News — PERK

AB 659- Cancer Prevention Act will be heard June 28th. Take action now!

AB 659- Cancer Prevention Act is misleading parents to think that HPV vaccine will be required for attendance in schools and colleges.

Status: Sen Health Committee Hearing Date: 06/28/23

AB 659 co-author ASM Friedman essentially admitting the bill’s intent is to mislead people into thinking you are required to receive HPV vaccine for school.

Action Steps:

Contact Senate Health Committee to demand they amend the bill by removing the “expected” language or remove the school notice section altogether.

  1. To oppose use AB 659 Health Committee One click Action link

  2. To oppose use AB 659 Latino Caucus One Click Action Link

  3. Submit your letter of opposition to legislative portal today.

  4. Call Senate Latino Caucus and Senate Health Committee

    Sample Script: Please oppose or abstain on Ab 659, unless amended to take out the word "expected".  This bill declares a state policy that it is "expected" for attendance leaves it open to misinterpretation to think the HPV vaccination is required. And misleads parents and administrators to think it is required.  This is especially confusing for non-English speaking families or that English is a second language to them

Take action on AB 659

Share

AB 665 passed Judicial Committee on June 20th.

AB-665 Minors: consent to mental health services goes to the Senate flooor for vote.

View voting results here.

AB 665 Removes the requirement that children must be a danger to themselves or others, or be alleged incest or abuse victims, before seeking care without their parents’ consent. This will remove the guardrails that prevent abuse of current law, so instead of cases of emergency, mental health professionals or school psychologists can refer for treatment and/or send a child to residential shelter services for any reason without parental consent.

Assembly Bill 665 purports to authorize Medi-Cal mental health care for low income kids. It doesn’t. It steals children from their homes without due process for parents.

The Premise: Two Laws Authorize Minor Consent, Only One Gives Medi-Cal Coverage

Law #1: “Danger Guardrails” to Counseling & Residential Shelter Services Family Code § 6924(b) (1979)

  • Law #1 allows mature children age 12+ to self-consent, without parental knowledge or consent, to mental health counseling and residential shelters, but only if danger is present: the child is (a) a danger to self or others, or (b) the victim of incest or abuse.

  • Medi-Cal pays for this counseling and residential shelter services because the “Danger Guardrails” are present and protect parents’ inalienable right not to have their children emoved from them without notice unless special, exigent circumstances exist.

Law #2: “Non-Danger” Counseling, Only Health & Safety § 124260)(b)(1) (SB543, Leno, 2010)

• Law #2 allows mature children age 12+ to self-consent, without parental consent, to

mental health counseling without any exigent circumstances. Opting into a residential

shelter is not provided.

• Medi-Cal does not pay for this counseling because of Welfare & Institutions Code.

Law #3: No Medi-Cal Benefits for “Non-Danger” Counseling

Welfare & Institutions Code § 14029.8 (2010)

Law #3 says that Medi-Cal does not pay for H&SC § 124260 counseling.



AB665 Intentionally Seeks to Amend the Wrong Law

AB665’s stated goal is to expand Medi-Cal coverage to include counseling services to lower-income and – presumably – immigrant and minority children under Health & Safety Code § 124260. What AB665 actually does is remove the “danger guardrails” that have been in place for almost 50 years, which ensure that only those children most at risk can “self-consent” into residential shelters without their parents’ or guardians’ knowledge or consent, or any allegation–let alone proof – of abuse, incest, or danger to themselves or others. Children should not be endangered and healthy, loving parents should not be denied their right to not have their child taken from them because of AB665’s attempted end-run around Medi-Cal requirements.


The solution

AB665 Gut and Amend: The Best Path to Authorizing Medi-Cal $$$

The only, most simple, effective, and legal way to actually “remove barriers to mental health access” to Medi-Cal recipients, without violating well-settled constitutional rights, is to strike one word from Law #2: “not.” By striking “not” from Law #3 (WIC § 14029.8), the law will read that Medi-Cal benefits shall apply to all services to all mature minors 12+ in the state and the authors’ stated goal of “mental health parity” will be achieved:

Welfare & Institutions § 14029.8 (Current)

“Section 124260 of the Health & Safety Code shall not apply to the receipt of benefits under the Medi-

Cal program.”

Welfare & Institutions § 14029.8 (Proposed Amendment)

“Section 124260 of the Health & Safety Code shall apply to the receipt of benefits under the Medi-Cal

program.”

Neither Code Section Should Be Amended to Allow Greater Access to Mental Health Services without Parental Involvement.

Share

Firefighters for Freedom win court of appeal.

Breaking News! Firefighters for Freedom won their appeal! Firefighters4Freedom, whose mission is to support the constitutional rights of firefighters in the City of Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic sued the city of Los Angeles over the City’s 2021 COVID-19 vaccine mandate for City employees. F4F won their court of APPEAL June 21st, 2023 from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Judge Michael P. Linfield dismissed in part and reversed with directions in part. The judge ruled that the lower court ruled in error. With an 82 page decision, the Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the lower court to dismiss the case. This is a critical victory for California and all who fight for freedom.  The tide is turning.   

PERK has been supportive of Fire Fighters For Freedom and their critical lawsuit against the city.  They have also been supportive of our lawsuit against LA County.  We have worked side by side to support each other and share the same legal team for our respective cases. Attorney John Howard and Attorney Scott Street have relentlessly fought the legal battles with the city and the county.  

Now, it's our turn.  Our lawsuit, Tsai v. Los Angeles County, was filed almost 2 years ago this fall.  In February, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Gail Killefer dismissed the case that PERK filed for employees of Los Angeles County who were ordered to get the COVID-19 shots under threat of termination. The decision has been appealed. The appeal involves the same issues as the Firefighters for Freedom appeal. While the firefighters’ opinion was not published (and thus cannot be relied upon in our case) we believe the Court of Appeals’ analysis was sound and that we will get a similar result. Thus, the Firefighters For Freedom win today helps our case.  We are so proud of everyone's hard work.  

These lawsuits are making a difference, both today and for future generations of Californians.  

PERK will continue our fight for all Californians to protect and preserve freedom. We are grateful for the support from our PERK members, county employees, and partners. Let's keep up the fight! These victories will only continue as we all hold the line for freedom.

Share

Upcoming events.

June 25th


June 27th

Join us on Tuesday June 27th 6:30-8:30 for an informative town-hall on LGTBQ curriculum in schools, Informed Parental Consent, Opt out letters for curriculum and our PERK Parent Action Plan. 

We hear the recent community concerns when it comes to inappropriate lessons being taught at school and the Gender Affirming laws being pushed. 

This is a private event and registration is required. Security will be on the premises to ensure safety for all. 

For any questions email: info@PERK-Group.com


June 29th

Share

FIGHT FOR PARENTAL RIGHTS REACHES BOILING POINT IN CA - Highwire segment

As schools across the nation continue to push LGBTQ+ curriculum, conflicts between parents and school staff escalate. President and Co-founder of PERK Advocacy (Protection of the Educational Rights of Kids), Amy Bohn, discusses the recent explosive clash outside a school board meeting in Glendale, CA, which led to an all out brawl and 3 arrests, including an ANTIFA member who is rumored to have elevated the peaceful protest to violence.

Share