CA School District Sued for Inappropriate “Gender Affirming” Surveys, Medically and Age Inappropriate Curriculum

PRESS RELEASE - November 7th, 2022

Parents file first lawsuit in California suing the school district for violating the law by illegally providing minors with inappropriate “Gender Affirming” surveys, medically and age inappropriate curriculum, without proper parent notification

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE IN THOUSAND OAKS, CALIFORNIA, NOVEMBER 7th, 2022 - On Friday, November 4th, 2022, plaintiffs Steven Schneider and Carrie Burgert, filed a lawsuit against Conejo Valley School District. for declaratory and injunctive relief, and petition for writ of mandate against the unconstitutional and illegal actions of the district. The Plaintiffs are represented by Attorney John Howard and Attorney Scott J. Street of JW Howard/ Attorneys, Ltd.

The complaint states the following

“The District has a clear and present duty to provide health/sex education that complies with California law. Instead, the District decided—in an arbitrary and irrational manner— to provide an education that is not age appropriate, medically accurate and free of bias. In so doing, it violated both its ministerial and discretionary duties.”

“These actions are unlawful. Schools have an obligation to teach health and sex education to kids. They do not have the right to teach kids about woke political issues that are, at best, medically unsettled and certainly not age appropriate. And, regardless of what school boards want to teach, they must respect the fundamental right that parents have to control their kids’ upbringing. Our children may be our future, but it is their parents’ right and responsibility to raise them.”

The Protection of the Educational Rights of Kids (PERK), is a bi-partisan, non-profit that advocates for civil rights and freedoms, with particular focus on protecting children. PERK protects parental rights and represents tens of thousands of parents and children across the state. PERK is supporting this lawsuit, and many others, and released the following statement:

Transitioning a child’s gender, promoting gender affirming treatment, and sexually explicit curriculum to minors without parent’s knowledge or proper consent is illegal. School Districts are clearly violating the law by providing minors with inappropriate “gender affirming” surveys and “gender affirming treatments” while withholding this from parents. These, so called, “Support Plans,” remove the most important and vital protection children have, the parent. This issue is getting national attention as the practice is increasing to give children puberty blockers to alter their gender.

This is not an LGBTQ issue. This is about the children. Children are minors. They are not equipped to make decisions of this nature without their parents. They should not be manipulated to make life altering medical treatments without their parents’ knowledge and consent. These choices are for adults to make, not minors. This is also about parents being the sole protectors and guardian of their child’s body, development, and mind.

The fundamental questions to ask are this: “Do you believe the government and/or school should be able to transition what gender your child is using puberty blockers and gender reassignment surgeries disguised as “support plans” without parental knowledge or consent?” Do you believe a child is capable of making a body altering, health decision, and treatment that’s irreversible, with consequences beyond their capacity as minors to even comprehend?

The laws protect children by requiring parents to receive parental notification, within proper time frames, as required by law. The law also requires that curriculums introduced must be age appropriate and medically accurate. These basic and essential legal requirements have been and continue to be violated by multiple school districts. These school officials have overstepped their authority and must be held accountable for the physical, emotional, and mental turmoil they are causing children and their families.

Sweden has banned surgeries on children and research shows puberty blockers may cause cancers. In the United States, states across the country, including Idaho and Florida, have also banned gender reassignment surgeries. Children are dealing with the highest cases of mental illness, academic loss, and mental health post pandemic. Parents, unknowingly, are sending their children to school to learn math, reading, science, and history, but instead their children are being transitioned. Schools are manipulating the child to believe they are not safe at home with their parent. It’s time for minors and parental sovereignty to be protected in California.

De-transitioners, such as Chloe Cole, have sounded the alarm that children are in grave danger. We stand as allies alongside parents, de-transitioners, the LGBTQ community, people of all creeds, political backgrounds, faith leaders, doctors, the medical community, united to protect children. For all of these reasons above, Protection of the Educational Rights of Kids, will be supporting this lawsuit. We believe this is the first lawsuit in California to contend with this national issue.

*************************************************************************

About PERK

Protection of the Educational Rights of Kids: PERK is a bi-partisan California 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation headquartered in California whose focus is on protecting children. PERK’s mission is to advocate for medical freedom, bodily autonomy, children’s rights, parental rights, civil rights and protect children’s right to an education PERK protects parental rights and represents tens of thousands of parents and children across the state. www.perk-group.com

Donate

To Donate and support the children and our efforts at https://donorbox.org/together-we-are-stronger

About Attorney John Howard & Attorney Scott Street

www.jwhowardattorneys.com

PERK Files Lawsuit Against the City of San Diego

PRESS RELEASE- January 28, 2022

On Friday, Jan. 28, 2022, the Protection of the Educational Rights of Kids (PERK), representing hundreds of Firefighters, Police Officers, and City Employees, and three individually named plaintiffs; Jonathan Wiese, Captain Justus Norgood, and Captain Manuel Del Torro, filed a lawsuit against the City of San Diego, for declaratory and injunctive relief, against the unconstitutional vaccine mandate against all first responders and city employees. These same heroes risked their lives protecting the people of San Diego for decades are now threatened with termination. 

PERK believes that a mass termination of First Responders, Public Workers, and Healthcare workers has severe consequences! Thousands of essential workers would be eliminated from the workplace, depleting and potentially decimating essential services which effectively keep our cities and communities functioning. These mandates devastate the fundamental services, protection, and societal infrastructure necessary for children and families at home, at school, indoors and outdoors, virtually all private and public spaces! The mandate jeopardizes our children’s basic health and well-being, including safety from fires, predators, crime, abuse and lack of emergency medical treatment! To protect our children, families and community-at-large from these potentially devastating consequences, PERK has chosen to engage in this lawsuit.

Download PDF

PERK Files Lawsuit on Behalf of Teachers and Educators of Granada Hills High School

PRESS RELEASE - January 19, 2022

The First Teachers And Educators In The State Of California Fired For Refusing To Take The Shot.
On Friday, Jan. 14, 2022, the Protection of the Educational Rights of Kids (PERK) and five individual educators filed a lawsuit against Brian Bauer, Executive Director of Granada Hills Charter High School (GH Charter) and GH Charter.  The plaintiffs filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief, damages based on violations of civil rights, and requested a jury trial. Attorney John Howard and Attorney Scott Street from JW Howard Attorneys, LTD represent the plaintiffs.

 The lawsuit, filed at the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, declares that the vaccine requirement for employees is illegal under state law and federal law, is discriminatory, unconstitutional, a violation of privacy under the California State Constitution, and a violation of the U.S. Constitution 1st amendment religious rights.

Download PDF

California Judge Stays School Vaccine Mandates

PRESS RELEASE - January 13, 2022

Alameda County, CA, January 13, 2022 - Today, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Brad Seligman ruled in favor of Petitioners Protection for the Educational Rights of Kids (PERK), Children’s Health Defense, California Chapter (CHD-CA), JANE DOE, and JANET DOE, parents whose children attend school within the Piedmont Unified School District, GRANTING their request for an expedited trial on the underlying lawsuit, and GRANTING an order staying enforcement of the District’s unlawful, unconstitutional, and dangerous COVID-19 injection requirement on children 5 years and older (Requirement) in the meantime. Piedmont Unified is the only school district in the state of California currently mandating experimental vaccines on children younger than 12 years of age.

Download PDF

Court Hearing for LAUSD Case, a “Wrinkle for LAUSD”

PRESS RELEASE - December 9, 2021

On Wednesday December 8, 2021, the PERK and CHD-CA Legal Team overcame the first hurdle yesterday when Judge Beckloff issued a tentative ruling yesterday morning to deny the preliminary injunction before the PERK/CHD-CA vs. LAUSD case was heard in court. The first success yesterday occured when the judge heard the arguments from our legal team and reconsidered his ruling.  The judge decided to take a few more days to deliberate.  It was a “win” that the judge did not rule against us yesterday.  However, a final ruling has NOT been issued on the case.  The judge wanted more time to reconsider the points heard in court yesterday. 

Our Legal Team argued statutory laws, education codes, and health codes.  They also argued Federal EUA Law and included vital points on the precedence the judge would set to deny the preliminary injunction.  The chaos that would ensue with over 920 school districts in California implementing any policy they wanted is problematic. PERK President Amy Bohn was present in the packed courtroom. See below for full press release.

Download PDF

Lawsuit Filed Against LAUSD

PRESS RELEASE - October 15, 2021

The petition states all the reasons why LAUSD and its board members have no legal authority to issue a Covid-19 vaccine requirement.  It also requests that the court inform LAUSD, emphatically, that the vaccine requirement is null and void and LAUSD cannot enforce their illegal mandate. 

The Petition was filed on Wednesday, October 13, 2021.  The legal team, on behalf of and the Protection of the Educational Rights of Kids (PERK) and Children’s Health Defense, California Chapter (CHD-CA) as institutional petitioners representing the rights and interests of thousands of CHD-CA and PERK members residing within the LAUSD, filed a petition with the Los Angeles division of the California Superior Court. 

Download PDF